Vitalik's ZKsync Pump: Or How to Move Markets With a Tweet Another Day, Ano...
2025-11-03 16 ZKsync
Okay, so Vitalik Buterin tossed a compliment ZKsync's way, calling their work "underrated and valuable." And suddenly, the ZK token jumps 50% after Vitalik Buterin backs ZKsync post. Seriously? Are we that easily swayed by a single tweet these days? It's like the crypto world is one giant, easily-manipulated meme stock.
The whole thing reeks of manufactured hype. ZKsync posted some self-serving garbage about Ethereum being "incorruptible," and Buterin retweeted it. Translation: "Hey, look at me! I'm still relevant!" "Incorruptible"? Let's be real, Ethereum's had its fair share of drama and questionable decisions. Remember the DAO hack? Yeah, incorruptible my ass.
And this "Atlas upgrade"? Thirty thousand transactions per second? Full Ethereum compatibility? It all sounds great on paper, but so did Theranos. I'll believe it when I see it, and even then, I'll probably still be skeptical. It's like these crypto projects are constantly chasing the next shiny object, promising the moon while delivering... well, mostly nothing. I mean, how many "Ethereum killers" have we seen come and go? A dozen? More?
Then again, maybe I'm being too harsh. Maybe ZKsync really is doing something revolutionary. But I doubt it.
They're calling one of their systems "Airbender." Airbender? Really? Are they trying to appeal to the Comic-Con crowd now? This isn't some freaking anime convention; it's supposed to be a serious technological advancement. Offcourse, maybe that's the problem. Maybe the whole industry has become a giant circle jerk of buzzwords and marketing fluff.

And this whole focus on "institutional-grade scalability"? Who cares? Are regular people actually clamoring for faster crypto transactions, or is this just a way for venture capitalists to make a quick buck? I mean, I'm still waiting for the day when I can actually use crypto for something other than buying drugs online or speculating on the next Dogecoin.
This also reminds me of the time I tried to get my bank to process a wire transfer. The hoops I had to jump through, the forms I had to fill out... it was like something out of the Soviet Union. All this talk about "interoperability" and "cross-chain settlement" sounds great, but I'm not holding my breath.
But here's the real kicker: Buterin's endorsement might actually be a bad thing for ZKsync. Think about it. How many projects has he publicly supported that have gone on to become massive successes? I'm drawing a blank here. It's almost like his blessing is a curse.
It's like when a celebrity endorses a product – does it actually make the product better, or just more expensive? And does anyone really trust celebrity endorsements anyway? Let's be real.
This whole thing is just another reminder that the crypto world is still driven by hype, speculation, and the whims of a few influential figures. Until we see some real-world adoption and tangible benefits, I'm not buying into any of it. Wake me up when crypto actually solves a problem, instead of just creating new ones.
Tags: ZKsync
Related Articles
Vitalik's ZKsync Pump: Or How to Move Markets With a Tweet Another Day, Ano...
2025-11-03 16 ZKsync
Vitalik's ZKsync Endorsement: Or, How to Pump Your Bags the 2025 Way Hype T...
2025-11-03 15 ZKsync
ZKsync's Leap: How Buterin's Backing Signals a New Dawn for Ethereum Okay,...
2025-11-03 14 ZKsync