Nvidia's AI Gold Rush: Are We Mining Fool's Gold? Nvidia's stock surge has...
2025-11-04 13 michael burry
Michael Burry, the man who called the 2008 housing crisis, is at it again. But this time, it’s not about predicting doom. A recent regulatory filing reveals some intriguing moves by his Scion Asset Management: bullish positions in Pfizer, Halliburton, Molina Healthcare, Lululemon, and bets against Nvidia and Palantir. Now, the headlines might scream “bearish on tech,” but I see something far more interesting—a glimpse into the future of healthcare, energy, and how we value innovation itself.
Let's dive into what this could mean.
Burry’s fund bought put options on roughly 5 million Palantir shares worth $912 million, and 1 million Nvidia shares worth $187 million. That's a substantial amount, making up 80% of Scion's disclosed US equity holdings! The knee-jerk reaction is to assume he's betting against the AI hype. But what if it’s more nuanced than that? What if he's not necessarily betting against these companies, but rather anticipating a shift in market sentiment, a cooling-off period after the explosion of AI enthusiasm? It's like the dot-com boom—everyone was rushing in, but eventually, reality had to catch up.
He also has call options on Pfizer and Halliburton, alongside holdings in Lululemon, Bruker, Molina Healthcare, and Sallie Mae. What does it all mean?
Could it be a strategic realignment towards sectors poised for long-term, sustainable growth, sectors that aren't solely reliant on the ephemeral nature of hype cycles? Think about it: healthcare is always going to be essential. Energy, especially with the move towards renewables (which Halliburton is involved in), is a fundamental need. And even Lululemon, with its focus on wellness, taps into a growing consumer trend.
This reminds me of the early days of the internet. People were skeptical, they didn't understand it, and some even dismissed it as a fad. But those who saw the potential, who understood the underlying shift, were the ones who reaped the rewards.
Burry himself warned of market "bubbles" on X, writing that “sometimes the only winning move is not to play.” Is he suggesting that the current valuations of Nvidia and Palantir are unsustainable, detached from their intrinsic value? Or is he simply saying that the risk-reward ratio is no longer favorable?
But the big question is: What does this tell us about the future of investment, about the very nature of innovation? Is Burry suggesting we need to look beyond the shiny new objects and focus on the foundational elements of society?

I see a potential shift in perspective. A move away from the purely speculative and towards the fundamentally sound. It's not about abandoning tech altogether, but about recognizing that true innovation needs to be grounded in real-world needs and sustainable business models.
And that's where Pfizer and Molina Healthcare come in. These are companies addressing fundamental human needs: health and well-being. They're not immune to market fluctuations, of course, but their value proposition is far more resilient than a company whose stock price is solely dependent on the next AI breakthrough. According to a recent report, Michael Burry adds bullish bets on Pfizer, Halliburton, Molina, and Lululemon (PFE:NYSE), Burry's Scion Asset Management has taken bullish positions in these companies.
When I look at Molina Healthcare, I see a company focused on providing healthcare to underserved communities. It's not just about profits; it's about making a real difference in people's lives. And that, in my opinion, is a far more sustainable business model than chasing the next unicorn.
But with great power comes great responsibility. As we invest in these foundational sectors, we must ensure that innovation is inclusive and benefits all of humanity. Are we doing enough to ensure that healthcare is accessible to everyone, regardless of their socioeconomic status? Are we addressing the ethical implications of AI in healthcare, ensuring that it's used to enhance human well-being, not to exacerbate existing inequalities?
We need to ask ourselves some tough questions.
I remember when I first started working in tech. The excitement, the energy, the feeling that we were building something that would change the world. But somewhere along the way, that sense of purpose got lost. It became more about profits and valuations than about making a real difference. I hope Burry's moves are a wake-up call, a reminder that true innovation needs to be grounded in something more than just hype.
I saw one comment on a Reddit thread discussing Burry's move that resonated with me: "He's not saying AI is bad; he's saying the market is overreacting. Time to buy when everyone else is selling." This sentiment captures the essence of contrarian investing—identifying opportunities where others see only risk.
Burry’s moves aren’t just about individual stocks; they're about a broader shift in how we value innovation. It's a reminder that the fundamentals still matter, that sustainable growth trumps fleeting hype, and that true value lies in addressing real-world needs. As investors, as innovators, and as citizens, we need to pay attention. The future isn't just about the next shiny gadget; it's about building a more resilient, equitable, and sustainable world.
Tags: michael burry
Related Articles
Nvidia's AI Gold Rush: Are We Mining Fool's Gold? Nvidia's stock surge has...
2025-11-04 13 michael burry
A New Era of Understanding? The Promise Hidden in Plain Sight We stand at t...
2025-11-04 11 michael burry
Burry's Betting Against AI? More Like Betting *On* the Inevitable Crash So,...
2025-11-04 15 michael burry
Burry's Bearish Bets: AI's Reality Check? Michael Burry, the investor famed...
2025-11-04 13 michael burry